Maulana Azad and Education
Irfan
Engineer
Sachar
Committee has well documented the educational backwardness among Muslims at all
levels – literacy rates are much below the national average, dropout rates are
higher among the Muslims and therefore, their numbers in graduation and post
graduation are much lower. Various reasons are being attributed for this
backwardness. However, the varied
analyses emanate from basically two perspectives. The first perspective blames
either Islam as a religion which is against secular education or blames Muslims
as a community for lack of interest in getting their children to schools. The
second perspective takes a closer look at the structure of the education system
that tends to keep the minorities, dalits, adivasis outside the system. The
first perspective is pushed by people with communal attitudes or subscribed by
those who form quick and lazy opinions. While the second perspective is
subscribed to by educationists, or those who are engaged with the problem of
educational backwardness.
Reasons
for educational backwardness among Muslims:
Poverty
is the biggest contributing factor behind the educational backwardness among
the Muslims. There is great diversity among the Muslim community along
linguistic and regional lines, sectarian lines and caste biradaries. Those Muslim biradaries or communities that enjoy higher
incomes, are educationally more forward. The Bohras, Khojas and Memons for
example, are more forward than, say, mehtars, bagwans or telis.
Upwardly mobile biradaries like Ansaris and Qureshi have
increasingly taken towards educating their children and some of them are doing
well and even becoming professionals. The awareness and thirst for education
has particularly increased after the demolition of Babri Masjid and the riots
that followed the demolition. Education is seen as key to secured jobs and
professions that cannot be destroyed during riots. Muslim girls have been
topping in SSC and HSC exams. The image of a domestic worker arguing with the
principal of a convent school with high fees to admit her child when we had
gone for a fact finding mission is still fresh in my mind. She told the
principal that she would forgo her meal one time and undertake extra work to
pay the fees of the school but not to keep her child out of the school gates.
Poor
Muslim families are forced to send their children for earnings or
apprenticeship so that s/he can start supporting the family. There is high rate
of child labour among Muslims in zardosi, carpet, bangles and other industries.
Many Muslim children have high skills, but no formal training and no
certificates, which forces them to remain on low survival incomes lifelong. Low
income means the next generation too would be labourers. There is no
inter-generational asset transfer and the community continues to decline.
Communal violence ensures that the meagre assets generated through hard work
get destroyed without adequate compensation and without rehabilitation of the
victims. Some members of the tiny middle class within the community slip into
poverty and doing small odd jobs when their small trade or business is
destroyed in violence. About 75-80% of Muslim families live off small labour
jobs.
Muslims
are forced into ghettos on the outskirts of towns and cities or rural areas.
These ghettos have poor infrastructure like approach roads, adequate water,
sewerage, electric connections, banking institutions and educational
institutions. Lack of schools within ghettos leave the option of seeking
admission in schools that are far away increasing the cost of education and in
cases of lack of proper approach roads, making it even more difficult. Schools
situated far away from Muslim ghettos also increase the security risk,
particularly after communal violence and for girl students. Parents in such
situations withdraw their children from school leading to high dropout rates.
Sachar Committee Report (SCR) finds that higher the proportion of Muslims in a
given locality, poorer is the infrastructure in the locality. There is inverse
relation between the proportion of Muslims in a given locality and the
infrastructure that has been provided by the state.
The
fourth reason is discriminatory attitude of school managements towards Muslim
children at the time of admission. Ghettos also exist in our minds, which often
informs us that Muslims should study in Urdu medium schools, even though Urdu
is not their mother tongue. They are less preferred as common attitudes are
that they would not be able to do well in their studies or continue. Alien
environment in the schools, which include imposition of religious prayers that
are against the creed of Islam and rituals like Saraswati Vandana, teaching of
Geeta, surya namaskar and other such rituals dissuade Muslim children from
continuing their education.
Last
but not least, Muslims are less represented in all walks of life, including the
political processes. Often they are less than one-third the number warranted by
their proportion in population. Needy parents have no one to approach to or
seek guidance and testimonies from. Good schools under the Muslim management
are too few and far between. Muslim trusts wanting to establish educational
institutions are not readily helped by the state by allotting land or coming
forth with grant-in-aid or even for granting recognition. The community is
least networked and it lacks social capital which is necessary for promotion of
education among the community.
The
problem lies with the nature of political leadership of the community as well.
The political leadership of the community represents the interests of the
upper-caste converts, or ashrafs and the tiny section of upper-middle
class. It is more engaged on issues of identity and resisting any change in the
Shari’a laws even within Quranic framework. The political leadership find a
sympathetic ear within the corridors of power in perpetuating the medieval
interpretation of Shari’a laws and Islamic jurisprudence which is discriminatory
towards women and against Quranic spirit. Having sympathetic ear on the issue
of Muslim Personal Laws helps the political leadership to gain legitimacy. The
political leadership of the community, with honourable exceptions, has not
emphasised the issue of promotion of education or addressed livelihood issues
of the community.
There
are too few good primary and secondary educational institutions mostly in urban
areas and members of Muslim community are less preferred and not inclusive
enough. The Indian state too has realized that India cannot really progress if
a large section of its population remains backward and uneducated. Therefore
Sachar Committee was appointed and some half hearted measures have been taken
like the PM’s New 15 point programme which partly attempts to address only one
of the problems listed above – poverty. The programme includes provision of
scholarships, hostel facilities, education loans and merit-cum-means
scholarships. But the programme faces triple jeopardy – lack of adequate funds,
lack of motivation among bureaucracy and lack of proper policy to address real
problems of the community. Due to lack of space, we are not going into the
details of the causes of failure of the programme to promote education. Poverty
is only one small cause that the State however inadequately attempted to
address. The net result is low figures in achievement on the educational front.
Maulana
Azad’s vision on education:
If
Maulana Azad had succeeded in persuading the Indian State to adopt his
policies, the scenario would have been different today. For him, appropriate
education policy of independent India was even more important than the
industrial policy. Maulana Azad, being the first education minister of the
independent India wanted to lay a strengthen and democratize our education
system. He worked for democratizing of education in order to universalize
achievement and thereby break the dominating structure of hegemonic hierarchies
of caste and class. His 4 objectives were
1) Removal of illiteracy through
universalization of elementary education up to secondary level and drive for
adult education, including education for women
2) Equalizing educational opportunities
in Indian society regardless of caste, community and class
3) Three language formula
4) Sound primary education throughout the
country
Azad
viewed “Every individual has a right to an education that will enable him to
develop his faculties and live a full human life. Such education is the
birth right of every citizen. A state cannot claim to have discharged its duty
till it has provided for every single individual the means to the acquisition
of knowledge and self-betterment.” ... “regardless of the question of
employment the state must make available to all citizens the facilities of
education up to the secondary stage.”
For
Maulana Azad, education was a crucial tool to inculcate the citizenship among
the people who just emerged from colonial rule and hierarchical structures like
caste and gender. Citizens needed to imbibe the values of equality and needed
to be sensitized on the religious, ethnic and linguistic diversity of the
country. In order to achieve universal primary and secondary education,
according to Maulana Azad, India needed to allocate at least 10% of its budget
for education. The allocation for education in budget was at best 6% and often
times, merely 2 to 3%. Maulana Azad wanted a substantial portion of the
educational budget to be spent on primary and secondary education and adult
education, including women. This would mean expanding and strengthening
schooling in every village and kasba and equal access to all – Hindus or
Christians or Muslims. The schools in India would teach values of equality and
justice, and sensitize the younger generation to the diversity. Maulana Azad
laid emphasis on teaching of values drawn from all religions.
The
Indian state not only gave less importance to education, but substantial
portion of its budget on education was allocated to creation of higher
institutions like IITs, IIMs, AIIMS, JNU and the rest, mostly based in the four
metros and accessible to the relatively richer class who could afford costly
tuitions in competitive entrance examinations in English language and after
schooling in expensive public schools. The doors of these elite institutions
were not entirely closed to those from poorer backgrounds and marginalized
sections like the SCs, the STs, the OBCs, women and minorities but the barriers
were so high that numbers from these sections entering these institutions was
more of an exception rather than a rule. Expenditure on these islands for elite
education was at the cost of expansion of primary and secondary school
networks.
Conclusion:
Islam
lays much emphasis on education. According to Tirmidhi and Ibn Majah, Ibn Abbas
narrated that the Messenger of Allah (SAW) said: "A single scholar of religion is more formidable against shaytaan (the
devil) than a thousand devout persons". The first and most crucial
obligation on Muslims is to acquire knowledge and secondly to practice, teach
and preach this knowledge. No man becomes a true Muslim without knowing the
meaning of Islam, because he becomes a Muslim not through birth but through
knowledge and deed. Islam lays emphasis on rationality. However, the Muslim religious
and political leadership has ignored this obligation. Perhaps Maulana Azad was
inspired by his understanding of Islam in spreading knowledge and education.
Education
is one instrument that can help members of a community to take part and
contribute meaningfully to the collective social life of the community.
Education helps imbibe values necessary for harmonious and peaceful collective
life, as well as for the environment and nature, for the development of
frontiers of knowledge and new understanding. Education can help us to be
better informed of our long term and sustainable interests, i.e. enlightened
self-interest. Education can also help us build and develop skills that are
necessary for livelihood and to contribute to the community.
Education
is a continuous process in the life of all individuals. We get educated through
our struggles for survival, and through our interaction with other human beings
and through interaction with nature and through varied experiences. Some
minimum education is acquired by all individuals from the family and the
members of extended family and community. However, meaningful education takes
place through institutions of learning, like – schools, colleges, research
institutes, universities, seminaries, institutions imparting professional and
vocational knowledge and skills. Access to quality education, professional
courses and higher education is always limited to the privileged elite. It is
the structure of education system in India that has not included Muslims and at
the same time lay the blame on the community. If we do pursue the dreams of
Maulana Azad, the whole nation would be benefited. Let us pursue the dream with
urgency.
No comments:
Post a Comment